CONCEPT:
Capacitance of a capacitor (C):
C = Q/V
Paralle Plate Capacitor:
$C = \dfrac{ϵoA}{d}$
Where C = capacitance, A = area of the two plates, ε = dielectric constant (simplified!), d = separation between the plates.
EXPLANATION:
$ C = \dfrac{ϵoA}{d−t+ \dfrac{t}{K}} $
CONCEPT:
We know that electric fields and voltage differences go hand-in-hand, and so it also turns out that the two plates are at different voltages. The size of this voltage difference ($V$) is related to the charges on the two plates ($Q$):
CALCULATION:
Explanation:
From Coloumb's law of electrostatic force we know,
$F = \dfrac{kq_1q_2}{r^2}$ (where, $k$ is a constant, $q_1$ and $q_2$ are two charges separated by distance $r$)
So, if the distance between the two charges is made half, with no changes of the charges, new distance becomes $\frac{r}{2}$
So, if now force acting between the same charges is $F$.
Then $F'= \dfrac{kq_1q_2}{(\dfrac{r}{2})^2} = 4\dfrac{kq_1q_2}{r^2} = 4 F$
So, that means, force will be 4 times of the initial value. Therefore, option A is correct.
Epsilon Naught Units | Units |
---|---|
Epsilon Naught in SI | Farad per meter or $\text{F.m}^{-1}$ |
Epsilon Naught in CGS | Columb square per Newton meter squared or $\dfrac{C^2}{\ce{N.m^2}}$ |
Therefore, option B is correct.
CONCEPT:
Ceq = C1 + C2
CALCULATION:
Given, C1 = C2 = C
Here, C1 and C2 are connected in parallel, therefore the equivalent capacitance is
⇒ Cpara = C + C
⇒ Cpara = 2C
Hence equivalent capacitance = 2c and option A is correct.
NOTE:
$\dfrac{1}{C_{eq}} = \dfrac{1}{C_1} + \dfrac{1}{C_2}$
Where C1 and C2 are two capacitors in the circuit.
The electric field intensity is given as:
$E = \dfrac{−dx}{dV}$
Its unit is volt/metre. Therefore, option D is correct.
1 amu is equal to mass of proton which is equal to 1.67×10−27 Kg or 1.67×10−24 gm.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Current, $I =\dfrac{charge}{time}$
⇒ Charge, $q = I × t$
$[q] = [AT]$
Therefore, option A is correct.
Explanation:
Construction wise a capacitor is made up of two plates with some dielectric medium in between them. When there is a potential difference between the plates, then an electric field is developed and direction is dependant on the polarity of plates. One plate will be positive while the other is negative, so the sum of charges on collecting plate and the condensing plates will be zero.
It depends upon whether the surface is a conductor or not. The electric field near some charge-carrying plate will be $\dfrac{\sigma }{2\epsilon_0}$, but if the point is near the surface of a conductor, then the electric field will be $\dfrac{\sigma }{\epsilon_0}$.
Let us understand first what is difference between a sheet and a plate in electrostatic.
Sheet => both side charge
Plate => one side charge
Here mentioned sheet, then surely charge will appear on both sides of the conductor.
Now, using the Gauss concept for finding an electric field.
Let $Q$ present in charged sheet conductor.
Because I clarify that both side charges are present in the sheet.
So, each side charge share = $\dfrac{Q}{2}$
Now, Gauss formula,
$Φ = \dfrac{Q_{net}}{2ε₀}$
Here, Qnet at one side = $\dfrac{Q}{2}$
Also, we know, $Φ$ { electric flux near the surface of sheet } = $E$ { electric field near the surface } × $A$ { cross-section Area of gaussian surface is chosen by us }
So, $EA = \dfrac{Q}{2ε₀}$
$E = \dfrac{Q}{2Aε₀} = \dfrac{Q/A}{2ε₀}$
We know, $Q/A$ = surface charge density = $σ$
$E = \dfrac{σ}{2ε₀}$
Hence, the electric field at a point near an infinite sheet of charged conductor is $\dfrac{σ}{2ε₀}$. Therefore option 3 is correct.
EXPLANATION:
If the uniform electric field will exist along x-axis then the equipotential surface will exist parallel to the yz-plane i.e. the planes that are normal to the x-axis.
An equipotential surface is a surface that comprises same electric potential at every point. Besides, the electric field is always perpendicular to it.
Therefore option C is correct.
EXPLANATION:
Coulomb force also called electrostatic force or Coulomb interaction, attraction or repulsion of particles or objects because of their electric charge.
The electric force is operative between charges down to distances of at least 10-16 metre, or approximately one-tenth ($\dfrac{1}{10}$) of the diameter of atomic nuclei.
Therefor option C is correct.
EXPLANATION:
The total charge to the potential ratio is constant for an isolated conductor.
$\dfrac{total \,charge}{potential} = isolated$
Therefore option A is correct.
EXPLANATION:
Van de Graff generator is an electrostatic generator which is devised to produce very high voltage by means of an endless belt collecting electrostatic charge from a source and transferring it to a large isolated metal sphere on which a large change accumulates.
Therefore, option B is correct.
Therefore, option D is correct.
EXPLANATION:
Metal is good conductor. So its $K=∞.$
Metal being a good conductor will easily allow charges to conduct and hence the permittivity will increase and its dielectric constant will tend to infinity.
Therefore, option C is correct.
EXPLANATION:
The relative permittivity of a material is ratio of its (absolute) permittivity to the permittivity of vacuum. For air it is almost 1.
Therefore, option C is correct.
CONCEPT:
The relation between coulomb and stat coulomb is given by:
1 C = 3 × 109 stat Coulomb = 3 × 109 esu
EXPLANATION:
1 coulomb equals to 3 x 109 esu. Therefore, option A is correct.
EXPLANATION:
A parrot will not be affected practically because both legs are at the same potential. Thus, current cannot flow through its body.
Therefore, option D is correct.
EXPLANATION:
Consider two charges: $q_1$ and $q_2$.
Charge on $q_1 = 10 \,×\, 10^{-6} \,C$.
Charge on $q_2 = -10 \,×\, 10^{-6} \,C$.
distance between them,
$r = 40 \,cm = -0.4 \,m$.
Now, electric potential energy between the charges is given as:
$U_E = \dfrac{kq_1q_2}{r}$ [$k$ = constant ($9 × 10^9 \,Nm^2/C^2$)]
$U_E = \dfrac{ -9 × 10^9 \,×\, 10 × 10^{-6} \,×\, 10 × 10^{-6}}{0.4}$
$U_E = \dfrac{-9}{4} × 10^9 × 10^{-9}$
$U_E = -2.25 \,J$
Thus, potential energy is given as $-2.25 \,J$. Therefore, option C is correct.
OVERVIEW:
Dielectric constant of a medium is basically the relative permittivity, i.e. ratio of permittivity of the medium with respect to permittivity in free space. So, Its S.I. unit is farad per meter or $\ce{Fm^{-1}}$.
CONCEPT:
Dielectric constant, $k = \dfrac{ϵ}{ϵ_0}$
EXPLANATION:
Therefore, option C is correct i.e. no unit.
EXPLANATION:
The force is independent of the path. The force depends on the path. Gravitational Force, Spring Force, and Electrostatic force between two electric charges are examples of conservative force.
Q. Why electrostatic is conservative?
Solution: Electrostatic force is conservative because the work done by the force depends on the initial and the final points of a test charge.
Therefore, option A is correct.
EXPLANATION:
The electrons and protons are balanced in body.
If electrons are removed from body then positive charge is more than negative.
Thus, body will be positive charged.
Therefore, option B is correct.
EXPLANATION:
The capacitance of a capacitor will decrease with if we introduce a slab of copper. Aluminium and zinc are metals with very high dielectric constant. If a slab of a metal with high dielectric is introduced, the capacitance will increase.
Therefore, option A is correct.
EXPLANATION:
Electric potential is defined as the potential difference between two points. So, electric potential at a point is defined with respect to a reference point. We take potential at the surface of earth as reference and is defined as zero.
By convection, electrostatic potential of earth is taken to be zero. It is considered that earth is a storehouse of infinite negative charges. So, ,most points are at a positive potential w.r.t it.
Therefore, option A is correct.
CONCEPT:
$C = \dfrac{Q}{V}$
EXPLANATION:
Units of capacitance:
⇒$1 \,farad = \dfrac{1\,coloumb}{1\,volt}$
⇒$1F = \dfrac{1C}{1V}$
Therefore, option B is correct.
EXPLANATION:
Henry (symbol H) is the SI derived unit of self-inductance.
Therefore, option D is correct.
EXPLANATION:
Permittivity:
Therefore, option C is correct.
EXPLANATION:
Shell theorem:
Intensity of electric field inside a uniformly charged hollow sphere is zero and outside the sphere we can assume the sphere to be a point charge present at centre and calculate E.
∴ The voltage is also constant inside hollow sphere as E = 0
Therefore, option C is correct.
CALCULATION:
$C_1$, $C_2$ are connected in parallel then equivalent capacitance is calculated as
$V = V_1 = V_2$ ...(1)
$q = q_1 + q_2$
$∴ CV = C_1V_1 + C_2V_2$
From (1), $C= C_1 + C_2$
Therefore option A is correct.